| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||
![]() |
||||||
| |
|
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Research Projects
PRESSURE IN THE HUMAN BODY
This project still needs researchers for further coninuation. If you want to sign up go to the bottom of this page.
Osteopathic managing of pressure in the human body / facts and fictions
Kind of research: basic research in fundamental sciences.
Study-design: litterature review. Questions asked: Which is the existing scientific substruction of the osteopathic visceral concept? Researchers: Heuperman L.V. (the Netherlands)
Onset of the study: 09/2001 Enddate: 07/2003 (finished) Project leaders: Rik Hoste
Influence of extra-abdominal and -thoracic pressure on intra-abdominal and -thoracic pressure reported by an intra-cavital pressure measurement method.
Kind of research: basic research in fundamental sciences This study wants to define the visceral concepts of intra-abdominal and intra-thoracal tension in a more better way. We also want to look if we can influence intra-abdominal pressure by acting on other body cavities.
Researchers: Heidi Putseys and Cyndi Van Alsenoy (Belgium).
Onset of the study: 01/2005 Enddate: 01/2008 (finished) Project leader: Patrick van Dun
Abstract van Dun P.L.S.1; Putseys H.; Van Alsenoy C.; De Backer W.A. 2; Devolder A.2; Willemen M.3; Vandenbril D.3; Serneels S.4 ; Methods In this study, 20 volunteers (age 21 -61, mean: 44) received three different weights (1, 3 and 5 kg) on the abdomen and afterwards on the thorax. Our intra-cavitary pressure method, a combination of gastral and esophageal method, was used to measure intra-abdominal and -thoracic pressure. This method consists of a tube with 5 sensors (ECCE Medical, Schoten, Belgium) connected to a double pressure transducer (type RespSponce III, Synetics Medical, Sweden). All signals were lead to a digital converter (DI 220; DATAQ instruments inc.,Akron, Ohio, USA;14 BIT, 500hz) with a resolution of 0,0076 mV or 0,0076 mbar and were saved on a computer (Windaq DI-220, DATAQ instruments INC., Akron, Ohio, USA). The signals were analyzed with browser software (Windaq waveform browser, DATAQ instruments Inc., Akron, Ohio, USA) and then roughly read into Matlab, a software program for statistical analysis. Results The weights of 1, 3 and 5 kg on the abdomen resulted in a significant increase in pressure of 0,57 mbar; 1,71 mbar and 2,54 mbar respectively in the abdominal cavity (p<0,01). The weight of 5 kg on the abdomen also resulted in a significant increase of pressure of 2,80 mbar in the thoracic cavity (p<0,01). The weight of 3 kg on the thorax resulted in a significant increase in pressure of 0,17 mbar in the abdominal cavity and 0,89 mbar in the thoracic cavity (p<0,02). The weight of 5 kg on the thorax resulted in a significant increase in pressure of 0,36 mbar in the abdominal cavity and 1,07 mbar in the thoracic cavity (p<0,01). The minimal manual pressure threshold for the abdomen was 8,18 kg and for the thorax 9,05 kg. Conclusions In this study we experimented with an intra-cavitary pressure method that was able to measure pressure in two different cavities simultaneously with only one device. Intra-cavitary pressure augmented linearly with the applied extra-cavitary pressure. The results also support previous studies which state that pressure changes in one cavity influences another cavity. Further studies will be needed to confirm these findings and to refine our measuring method. Still much fundamental research is to be done to investigate the influence of manual pressure on body cavities and its possible physiological consequences.
1 Commission for Osteopathic Research, Practice and Promotion (CORPP, vzw, Belgium) All correspondance to: Patrick van Dun, DO
I want to sign up for this Researchproject. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||